Written by Joshua Kurlantzick.

Early last week, a U.S. aircraft carrier arrived in Vietnam, marking the first time a U.S. carrier had come to the country since the end of the Vietnam War. The carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, made a port call that, according to the Washington Post, involved “nearly 6,000 sailors [and] marks the largest U.S. presence in Vietnam since the 1975 U.S. withdrawal after years of combat.” The port call came on the heels of a January visit to Vietnam by Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, during which he declared that “America wants a stronger relationship with a stronger Vietnam.”

U.S.-Vietnam strategic ties have been solidifying for years. Vietnam also has hosted multiple port calls in Cam Ranh Bay, purchased a major Coast Guard cutter from the United States, and Hanoi and Washington have a robust, high-level strategic dialogue that has, in recent years, expanded to include a broad range of shared security concerns. U.S. officials welcome Vietnam’s approach to the South China Sea, as Hanoi has a professional military, a skilled set of senior officers and analysts, and generally a tough style in dealing with Beijing’s activities in the South China Sea.

Yet while the U.S. aircraft carrier visit received substantial press coverage, another aspect of Vietnam’s evolving strategic strategy—one of strengthening its relations with a variety of regional powers skeptical of or outright hostile to China—was not covered as widely in global media outlets.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi hosted Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang and a delegation of Vietnamese officials last week. During the visit to India, the two sides discussed joint exploration in the South China Sea, announced again their shared commitment to freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, discussed plans for Vietnam to purchase more defense equipment from India, and inked agreements to further cooperate on civil nuclear issues, as well as agriculture and other areas.

India has proven willing to potentially work with Vietnam to explore blocks of the South China Sea disputed by Beijing, and will likely do so again in the future.

As I recently wrote in World Politics Review, although the Trump administration has vowed to take a tougher approach to the South China Sea than its predecessor, and though it clearly is attempting to woo Vietnam—an approach in line with decades of warming U.S.-Vietnam ties—Hanoi remains concerned about aspects of U.S. strategy in Southeast Asia. Hanoi also wants to cultivate a broader set of partners, beyond the United States, who could bolster Vietnam’s approach to the South China Sea and could present an anti-China strategic bulwark generally. While Hanoi clearly appreciates a U.S. approach to the South China Sea that uses more regular freedom of navigation operations and (at least rhetorically) pushes back harder against China’s militarization and land reclamation, Hanoi also has doubts about the long-term sustainability of the U.S. posture in the South China Sea.

In addition, the Trump administration’s trade policies are not well-liked by Hanoi, which is part of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the overall seeming unpredictability of the White House is not a great fit for Vietnamese leaders.

To fill this gap, Hanoi has been wooing a wide range of other regional partners. Some, like South Korea and even Australia, while possessing growing strategic and economic power in Southeast Asia, remain wary of doing anything in the South China Sea that would be highly alienating to Beijing. Others, like Singapore and Japan, are limited in their ability to partner with Vietnam on South China Sea-related issues by their constitutions or their size.

But India, with a blue water navy, a similar level of skepticism of Chinese foreign policy as Vietnam, a willingness to throw Delhi’s power around in the South China Sea, and a desire to have a long-term, sustained security presence in Southeast Asia, is in some ways an ideal major partner for Vietnam. In fact, Vietnam is now at the heart of India’s Look East strategic policy.

Already, India has proven willing to potentially work with Vietnam to explore blocks of the South China Sea disputed by Beijing, and will likely do so again in the future. This willingness demonstrates, to Vietnam, that India is committed to significant push back against Chinese claims in the South China Sea. As the Hindu noted in a piece on the Vietnamese president’s visit:

Both Mr. Modi and Mr. Quang spoke of the importance of joint exploration of oil and gas reserves off the coast of Vietnam in the South China Sea (SCS) by ONGC Videsh Limited (OVL) and PetroVietnam (PVN). In January this year, the Chinese Foreign Ministry reacted to the Vietnamese Ambassador’s invitation to India for more joint exploration projects in areas it claims, by saying that they must not be used as an “excuse to infringe upon China’s legitimate rights and interests in the South China Sea and impair regional peace and stability.”

Yet all signs suggest that India and Vietnam are going to continue with this plan of joint exploration, and possibly attempt to involve companies from a third country as well, no matter what China says—a significant sign of India’s growing cooperation with Vietnam on South China Sea issues.

In addition, India likely will continue its line of credit to Vietnam to purchase Indian defense equipment and eventually increase it, in order to allow Vietnam to purchase more weaponry from India. Delhi and Hanoi also have major concerns about China’s Belt and Road Initiative—although Vietnamese officials are less wary than Indian ones—and the two sides may, in the future, want to be close partners to some other future regional alternative (or at least, partial alternative) to Belt and Road.

Joshua Kurlantzick is senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He tweets @JoshKurlantzick. This article was first posted on the Council of Foreign Relations Asia Unbound blog and has been reposted under a Creative Commons license. Image credit: by Indian Ministry of External Affairs/Flickr.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *